The Power of Complements
In this week's lecture:
- Examples and definition of complementary products
- The economic definition for complementary products
- Cross-price elasticity of complementary products
- How substitute goods can also be surprising complements
- Interesting strategies in markets with complementary products
- Supporting the supplier of a complementary product
- Produce the complements - Advantages and disadvantages
- Strategies for firms that produce the complements
- Cross subsidize complementary products
- Bundle complementary products
- Increase Lock-In
- How complementarity can help achieve cooperation among firms who might otherwise compete
- Competitors as Complementors
- How Strategic Partnerships foster coordination between firms
- Shared decision making
- Organisation Integration
- Economic Integration
Complementary Products
Examples of complementary products:
- Computers and Software
- Skis & Skiing Sticks
- Smartphones & Apps
Economic Definition
The utility increase when the products are used together.
- Two products A and B
- These are complements if B increases users' utility from A, and vice versa
- U(A+B) > U(A) + U(B)
Cross-Price Elasticity
- Two products A and B
- These are complements if the demand for B increases when the price of A drops, and vice versa
- This phenomenon is referred to as negative cross price elasticity
- Cross price elasticity is how the price of one product depend on the price of another products
Surprising Complements
- Substitute good can also have complementary effects
- A price cut of the substitute good decreases market share but increases the size of the market, resulting in a positive net effect
- Example: Cloth shops in the same mall
- Shop A's price cut makes the whole mall more attractive
- Shop B's sales increase due to the additional customers
Supporting the Supplier
- Enable the supplier in ways that increase sales of complement e.g.:
- Better quality of complement
- Higher sales of complement
- Example: Apple
- Gave laptops to students writing software for Mac OS
- More compatible software titles made Apple's laptops more attractive
- Example: Game console manufacturer 3DO
- Problem
- Console manufacturers sold consoles for high prices to make profits
- This attracted a limited number of customers only
- Neither optimal for console manufacturers not for game publishers
- Solution
- Publishers paid a fee of 3 dollars to 3DO for every game copy sold
- 3DO could sell consoles much cheaper and attract more customers
- This way, publishers could sell more copies and increase profits
Producing Complements
- It may make sense to produce the complement yourself
- Example
- Sony produces game console and video games
- Hewlett Packard manufactures printers and printing ink
- Contra
- Market for complements may simply be unattractive
- Complement may require competencies the firm lacks (production, R&D, management, ...)
- Prospective customers might be put off by a firm's dominant position
- Pro
- Better tailoring of complement to own product
- Quality control for complement
- Internalization of the positive effects (externalities) of the complement on own product
- Cross-Subsidies
- Bundling
- Increasing Lock-in
Cross Subsidies
- Idea
- Product A is sold at small margins (even loss) to increase sales of Product B (high margins)
- Advantage
- Increase profits through intelligent pricing
- Risks
- Consumers do not buy product B at all
- Consumers buy product B from another manufacturer
- Examples:
- Razors and razor blades
- Printers and printer cartridges
- Mobile phones & operator contracts
Bundling
- Idea
- Firm sells product A and complement B combined as a package
- Advantage
- Little or no competition in market for A
- Decreased competition in market for B
- Risks
- Potential buyers of "A only" or "B only" are lost
- Bundling becomes standard and advantages of unbundling are overlooked
- e.g. How to differentiate and how to set prices
- Examples
- Game console and games
- e.g. Wii bundle with console, game, steering wheel
- Operating system and web browser
- Flight and baggage handling
Increasing Lock-In
- Idea
- Users have switching costs when switching from A to a substitute
- The more complements (B, C, ...) to A they buy, the higher the switching cost
- Advantage
- Higher switching costs imply a higher value of the customer to the firm
- You can charge customers higher prices
- Examples
- Microsoft Office and MS Windows
- Games and video consoles
Competitors as Competitors
- In certain situations, firms may be
- Competitors in one part of the market
- Complementors in another part of the market
- In such a constellation, they may not compete that harshly
- Example: Music Players & Music Content
- Sony and Apple
- Competitors
- Both sell portable music players
- Complementors
- Sony Music provides music content for Apple's iPod / iPhone
- Apple's iTunes store is important sales platform for Sony's music content
- Example: Mobile Phone Calls
- Vodafone and T-Mobile
- Competitors
- Both sell mobile phone contracts
- Complementors
- Their networks are interlinked
- Customers join Vodafone because they know that they can also call T-Mobile customers , and vice versa.
- Parts of Vodafone's / T-Mobile's revenues come from these cross-network calls
Strategic Partnerships
- Drivers of Strategic Partnerships
- Producers of complementary goods depend on each other
- Helping each other and coordinating each other's behaviour maximizes the positive effects of complementarity
- In many cases, integration into one single company not feasible or not desired by involved firms
- Forming a strategic partnership is a powerful way of institutionalizing coordination and formalising interests
- Definition of Strategic Partnerships
- Relationships between firms
- Typical characteristics
- Shared decision making
- Organizational linkages & coordination mechanisms(organisational integration)
- Joint equity ownership (economic integration)
- Organisational Integration
- Teams across firms
- Established reporting and decision routines across firms
- Heavy exchange of information
- Economic Integration
- Direct cross ownership of equity
- Firm A holds X% of Firm B's assets and vice versa
- Setting up a new legal entity (joint venture)
- Benefits
- Alignment of interests
- Retention of control and exclusivity
- Feasibility of inter-organisational coordination
- Complementarity and Strategic Partnerships
- If firms produce complementary products, already high incentives to work together cooperatively
- Less need for economic integration to align interests
No comments:
Post a Comment